[C++-sig] convertibility and "Pythonicity"

[Niki Spahiev]

David Abrahams wrote:
> [Is "Pythonicity" the right word?]
> 
> I'm interested in getting some qualitative feedback about something I'm
> doing in Boost.Python. The questions are,
>     1. How well does this behavior match up with what Python users have
> probably come to expect?
>     2. (related, I hope!) How close is it to the intended design of Python?
> 

about __int__, __float__, __str__

IMHO __str__ is for 'print'. Any object has some to_string conversion, 
while __int__ and __float__ are for numbers only.

HTH
Niki Spahiev