[C++-sig] VC++ 7.1 (VStudio.NET 2003) linking problem

Sameer Agarwal sagarwal at cs.ucsd.edu
Wed Jul 2 23:02:16 CEST 2003


oops, many apologies, this was not meant for this mailinglist.

sameer


On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Sameer Agarwal wrote:

> well for one thing, the notation in your 98 paper is much more consistent
> and correct as compared to the notation in the book chapter. Infact you
> keep going back and forth between using p and f for the phase function.
> Besides that the subscripts for L are also mixed up at a number of places.
>
> I went through the 98 paper yesterday and that does not have any mistakes
> in it.
>
> sameer
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
>
> > I am using VC++ 7.1 without having link problems.
> > But IIRC someone mentioned problems with pre-compiled header files.
> > Could this be related to your difficulties?
> > Ralf
> >
> > --- Mike Rovner <mike at nospam.com> wrote:
> > > I'm trying to move my project from VC++ 7.0 to 7.1
> > > There was no problem under 7.0
> > > When linking I got the following:
> > >
> > > error LNK2005: "class boost::arg<3> `anonymous namespace'::_3"
> > > (?_3@?A0x2264d27d@@3V?$arg@$02 at boost@@A) already defined in file1.obj
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > C++-sig mailing list
> > C++-sig at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig
>





More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list