[C++-sig] Re: injected constructors

David Abrahams dave at boost-consulting.com
Sun Sep 21 23:06:24 CEST 2003

Gideon May <gideon at computer.org> writes:

> --On Sunday, September 21, 2003 2:50 PM -0400 David Abrahams
>   <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
>>> Gideon May <gideon at computer.org> writes:
>>>> Dave,
>>>> --On Sunday, September 21, 2003 11:18 AM -0400 David Abrahams
>>>>> The code snippet is missing the definitions of classes, etc.  Can't
>>>>> you produce a minimal test case?  I don't even see make_constructor
>>>>> in here.
>>>> I just realized that I compiled with warning level 3. The warning
>>>> doesn't show up with the default warning level. I've created a simple
>>>> (contrived) test case which
>>> Oh, how annoying!  But thanks for the pointer.  The enclosed patch
>>> fixes it.
>> Whoops, I mean this:
> Hmmm, deep zen :)
> But, I applied the patch from the previous message and now
> the compiler is happily, silently crunching away.
> Thanks!
> PS, the injected constructors work great!
> Not to bug, but can we expect a release soonish ? There
> are so many new features which I am using and I would love
> to release an update of my bindings based on the current BPL.

Ask on the Boost developers' list.  It's not up to me alone.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list