[C++-sig] Re: injected constructors
dave at boost-consulting.com
Sun Sep 21 23:06:24 CEST 2003
Gideon May <gideon at computer.org> writes:
> --On Sunday, September 21, 2003 2:50 PM -0400 David Abrahams
> <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
>>> Gideon May <gideon at computer.org> writes:
>>>> --On Sunday, September 21, 2003 11:18 AM -0400 David Abrahams
>>>>> The code snippet is missing the definitions of classes, etc. Can't
>>>>> you produce a minimal test case? I don't even see make_constructor
>>>>> in here.
>>>> I just realized that I compiled with warning level 3. The warning
>>>> doesn't show up with the default warning level. I've created a simple
>>>> (contrived) test case which
>>> Oh, how annoying! But thanks for the pointer. The enclosed patch
>>> fixes it.
>> Whoops, I mean this:
> Hmmm, deep zen :)
> But, I applied the patch from the previous message and now
> the compiler is happily, silently crunching away.
> PS, the injected constructors work great!
> Not to bug, but can we expect a release soonish ? There
> are so many new features which I am using and I would love
> to release an update of my bindings based on the current BPL.
Ask on the Boost developers' list. It's not up to me alone.
More information about the Cplusplus-sig