[C++-sig] Re: injected constructors

[David Abrahams]

Gideon May <gideon at computer.org> writes:

> --On Sunday, September 21, 2003 2:50 PM -0400 David Abrahams
>   <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
>
>>> Gideon May <gideon at computer.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Dave,
>>>>
>>>> --On Sunday, September 21, 2003 11:18 AM -0400 David Abrahams
>>>>> The code snippet is missing the definitions of classes, etc.  Can't
>>>>> you produce a minimal test case?  I don't even see make_constructor
>>>>> in here.
>>>>
>>>> I just realized that I compiled with warning level 3. The warning
>>>> doesn't show up with the default warning level. I've created a simple
>>>> (contrived) test case which
>>>
>>> Oh, how annoying!  But thanks for the pointer.  The enclosed patch
>>> fixes it.
>>
>> Whoops, I mean this:
>>
>
> Hmmm, deep zen :)
>
> But, I applied the patch from the previous message and now
> the compiler is happily, silently crunching away.
>
> Thanks!
>
> PS, the injected constructors work great!
> Not to bug, but can we expect a release soonish ? There
> are so many new features which I am using and I would love
> to release an update of my bindings based on the current BPL.

Ask on the Boost developers' list.  It's not up to me alone.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com