[C++-sig] Re: implicitly_convertible and char*
dleary at gmail.com
Sat Jul 3 20:23:07 CEST 2004
yeah, that was an unrelated side note that someone else brought up...
the issue is that implicity_convertible<X, const char*> is not working
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 14:19:27 -0400, David Abrahams
<dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> Dusty Leary <dleary at gmail.com> writes:
> > so, any news on this?
> What news grould there be? char const* and const char* are the same
> thing, so trying it won't make any difference.
> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:49:39 -0400, David Abrahams
> > <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> >> "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk at yahoo.com> writes:
> >> > I don't really feel competent in this matter, but I believe char const* and
> >> > const char* are two different things. Did you try it with "const char*"?
> >> They are the same thing.
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
More information about the Cplusplus-sig