[Cryptography-dev] What's in a name?

[Paul Kehrer]

I (along with Alex Gaynor) tried out “PyCA cryptography” at the OpenStack Summit and it seemed to work reasonably well. I’m inclined to go with that for now. Do others agree/should we update our docs to use that as disambiguation?

On May 12, 2014 at 9:58:40 PM, Terry Chia (terrycwk1994 at gmail.com) wrote:

I like the cryptography name although I'll be open to changing it. Is  
there any suggestions at all currently or is this a vague "we should  
change this so people won't get confused" thing? I like the idea of  
pushing PyCA more though.  

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Glyph <glyph at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:  
> On May 12, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Alex Stapleton <alexs at prol.etari.at> wrote:  
>  
>> I do quite like the name despite its failings. Maybe we should push the PyCA brand more than the individual packages? It would probably make searching a bit easier.  
>  
> Would it make sense to then change the headings in the documentation and such to "PyCA's Cryptography Package"?  
>  
> -g  
> _______________________________________________  
> Cryptography-dev mailing list  
> Cryptography-dev at python.org  
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev  
_______________________________________________  
Cryptography-dev mailing list  
Cryptography-dev at python.org  
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cryptography-dev/attachments/20140519/31855e51/attachment.html>