[Cryptography-dev] What's in a name?

[Terry Chia]

+1 for what Paul said.

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Paul Kehrer <paul.l.kehrer at gmail.com> wrote:
> I (along with Alex Gaynor) tried out “PyCA cryptography” at the OpenStack
> Summit and it seemed to work reasonably well. I’m inclined to go with that
> for now. Do others agree/should we update our docs to use that as
> disambiguation?
>
> On May 12, 2014 at 9:58:40 PM, Terry Chia (terrycwk1994 at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> I like the cryptography name although I'll be open to changing it. Is
> there any suggestions at all currently or is this a vague "we should
> change this so people won't get confused" thing? I like the idea of
> pushing PyCA more though.
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Glyph <glyph at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>> On May 12, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Alex Stapleton <alexs at prol.etari.at> wrote:
>>
>>> I do quite like the name despite its failings. Maybe we should push the
>>> PyCA brand more than the individual packages? It would probably make
>>> searching a bit easier.
>>
>> Would it make sense to then change the headings in the documentation and
>> such to "PyCA's Cryptography Package"?
>>
>> -g
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cryptography-dev mailing list
>> Cryptography-dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
>