[Datetime-SIG] Calendar vs timespan calculations...

[Łukasz Rekucki]

On Monday, August 3, 2015, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:

> [Guido]
> > Is there a way to end the discussion of leap seconds by fiat? Or maybe
> > someone can create leap-seconds-sig where those so inclined can continue
> the
> > discussion? The handling of leap seconds by the stdlib isn't going to
> change
> > in the forseeable future (let's say until 2038 :-).


Thank you :)


>
> +1.  That means it conveniently ends here with my last message on the
> topic, overlapping yours by seconds.  I said everything there that
> needs to be said ;-)

_______________________________________________
> Datetime-SIG mailing list
> Datetime-SIG at python.org <javascript:;>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/datetime-sig
> The PSF Code of Conduct applies to this mailing list:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>


-- 
Łukasz Rekucki
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/datetime-sig/attachments/20150803/da303b88/attachment.html>