[Datetime-SIG] PEP 495 Q & A

Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Sun Aug 23 04:36:16 CEST 2015

On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm on board with fold=0 and fold=1.  I only hated "fold" when it was
> False and True.  Now we're indexing a theoretically unbounded sequence
> of folds by an ordinal, which makes perfect sense - the later the
> time, the larger the ordinal ;-)

Great!  I'll let it simmer for a few days and start making the change in
the PEP and the code.

I don't think it will be right to call it a "flag" anymore.  What will be
the right word: a fold index?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/datetime-sig/attachments/20150822/70cc3364/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Datetime-SIG mailing list