[Distutils] MANIFEST generation
jeremy at alum.mit.edu
Fri Sep 26 22:31:08 EDT 2003
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 06:01, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> I still think that the default behaviour is not the best one, but being
> able to write a setup.cfg file and forget about it is an acceptable
> trade off.
It agree that the default behavior seems problematic. I always use
sdist --force-manifest when building a release. What's the use case for
ignoring files in a source distribution that would otherwise be
included? It doesn't sound like an obvious default.
More information about the Distutils-SIG