[Distutils] setuptools controversy (was Re: Prototype setuptools-specific PyPI index.)
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Mon Jul 23 23:56:37 CEST 2007
On Jul 23, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On 7/23/07, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
...
>> Usually, people think they can get away with making "simpler"
>> versions of Zope because they don't understand the full range of
>> requirements which it is intended to meet. The situation with
>> setuptools is much the same, except that sometimes now it's the Zope
>> folks making the accusations of too many features, excess complexity,
>> evil, etc. :)
I can't find your message, so I'm responding via Fred's.
I hope none of the "Zope folks" have said setuptools is evil. We're
big fans and are adopting it whole heartedly. We want it to succeed.
Speaking for myself, I think it would benefit from being simpler. It
is a lot more complex that I suspect you realize. Of course, there
are things I might do differently. But it is a great accomplishment.
You should be very proud of it and we are very grateful.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list