[Distutils] PEP 345

Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk
Tue Oct 20 15:47:40 CEST 2009

Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Agreed. And every piece of puzzle is starting to emerge.
> As Marc-André said, PEP 390 is less important and could be done in
> distutils even without PEP,
> as long as we add the markers in PEP 345, (meaning we accept 386).

What markers are you referring to?

A quick scan of http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0345/ shows no sign 
of any of the contentious bits of PEP390. What am I missing?

(other than that 386 should be accepted and implemented asap...)


Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list