[Distutils] PEP 345

[Tarek Ziadé]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. And every piece of puzzle is starting to emerge.
>>
>> As Marc-André said, PEP 390 is less important and could be done in
>> distutils even without PEP,
>> as long as we add the markers in PEP 345, (meaning we accept 386).
>
> What markers are you referring to?
>
> A quick scan of http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0345/ shows no sign of
> any of the contentious bits of PEP390. What am I missing?

That's the part I have not added yet. Markers are the "sys_platform ==
'win32" things
discussed in PEP 390.

See the other thread (RFC: PEP 345...)


> (other than that 386 should be accepted and implemented asap...)

Its implemented, we just need a consensus

<flameware shield ;) >
no consensus would mean that if a minority that have enough supporters
objects the PEP,
and provide an alernative, we would have another round.
</flameware>