[Distutils] conventions or best practice to choose package names?

[Benoît Bryon]

Hi,

Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
> Le 31/05/2012 18:00, PJ Eby a écrit :
>> You've definitely put in a lot of work on this, and most of the 
>> actual guidelines in your PEP are quite good.  I think there's a core 
>> part of this that can and should be a good Informational-track PEP.
>
> If it actually becomes a draft PEP, I guess we should:
>
> * move the document in PEPs' repository
> * add notes in Python packaging documentation to reference the PEP.

Updated 
https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/src/doc-package-names/Doc/packaging/packagenames.rst
Prepared migration to a PEP.
I am to submit the document for review at peps at python.org. Feedback is 
welcome!


Le 06/06/2012 10:52, Benoît Bryon a écrit :
> Also, I propose to shorten or move the "terminology" section in 
> another document (another pep or in packaging documentation):
>
> * it would simplify the document
> * we'd better share the terminology between several documents.

Moved terminology section to packaging/introduction.rst.
See 
https://bitbucket.org/benoitbryon/cpython/changeset/5eca478e6804#chg-Doc/packaging/introduction.rst

Benoit