[Distutils] abstract build system PEP update

[Donald Stufft]

> On Feb 18, 2016, at 5:26 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [1] One downsides of managing PEPs as PRs against the packaging specs
> is that there is no easy quotable term to refer to them by - we could,
> and probably should, use the PR number. And as a consequence, it's
> hard to quickly find the text because there's no simple form for the
> URL (again mitigated by using the PR number).

I've merged the two PRs and given them numbers, Robert's PEP is PEP 516 and
Nathaniel's is PEP 517.

-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20160218/8fa71488/attachment-0001.sig>