[Distutils] comparison of configuration languages

[Alex Grönholm]

+1. I don't think the pathological cases of YAML syntax are of any 
concern in this context. Plus it has excellent tooling support, unlike TOML.

07.05.2016, 09:25, Fred Drake kirjoitti:
> On May 6, 2016, at 10:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> Here's that one-stop writeup/comparison of all the major configuration
>> languages that I mentioned:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/njsmith/78f68204c5d969f8c8bc645ef77d4a8f
> Thank you for this!  A very nice summary.
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>> While I personally prefer YAML to any of the options on a purely syntax based
>> level, when you weigh in all the other considerations for this I think that it
>> makes sense to go with TOML for it.
> I expect either YAML or TOML would be acceptable, based on this.  I'll
> admit that I'd not heard of TOML before, but it warrants consideration
> (possibly for some of my projects as well).
>
> I've spent a fair bit of time using YAML with Ansible lately, as well
> as some time looking at RAML, and don't find myself worried about the
> syntax.  Every oddness I've run across has been handled with an error
> when the content couldn't be parsed correctly, rather than unexpected
> behavior resulting from misunderstanding how it would be parsed.  It's
> entirely possible I just haven't run across the particular problems
> Donald has run across, though.
>
> (The embedded Jinja2 in Ansible playbooks is another matter; let's not
> make that mistake.)
>
>
>    -Fred
>