[Edu-sig] Re: Best approach to teaching OOP and graphics
ajsiegel at optonline.net
Sat Mar 26 02:21:09 CET 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edu-sig-bounces+ajsiegel=optonline.net at python.org [mailto:edu-sig-
> bounces+ajsiegel=optonline.net at python.org] On Behalf Of urnerk at qwest.net
> I'd have to see you proposal fleshed out in more detail. What is the
> triangle a subclass or superclass of? What are its methods and
Its less of a proposal than an observation. OOP is in fact often introduced
by way of classes of geometric objects, and subclasses thereof.
Java in a Nutshell Second Edition Chapter 3
"Classes and Object in Java" walks the reader through the creation of a
Circle class, explains that "Objects are Instances of Classes" and goes from
there in defining constructors, methods, etc. and then eventually
subclassing the Circle class with a DrawableCircle class.
The point is not that this particular book adopts this approach, but that in
so doing it is conforming to something of a convention - or so it seems to
me. Like the 3d teapot, or the "Hello World" program.
But there is no real point being made beyond that. If one chooses to follow
the convention - something like VPython provides a quite convenient way for
one to get one's DrawableCircle to actually draw, and without the need to
prepare anything in the way of a drawing context - which might otherwise
become the most complex, obscure and least relevant portion of the code.
> And what is the VPython framework you'd use to introduce OO?
Uhm... PyGeo ;)
More information about the Edu-sig