[Edu-sig] Pre-announcement announcement

[ajsiegel at optonline.net]

Andre -

I am on a short business trip so it is difficult to reply properly.

Just wanted to thank you for your work, and let you know that I find the comments
quite helpful.

Bottom line, I conclude that is unwise to attempt to reach out beyond the Python literate
community before I can offer a more complete environment for PyGeo as part of the
distribution.

I think the solution will be a customized sCIte editor. 

I have looked at this before and it doesn't seem overly difficult to do, and a distribution 
of this kind seems to be within the license terms and intent of the sCIte author.

And yes, I will recipricate re: rur-ple 

(Caught your "rant" on planetpython, btw)

Art


----- Original Message -----
From: Andre Roberge <andre.roberge at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Pre-announcement announcement

> On 1/22/06, Arthur <ajsiegel at optonline.net> wrote:
> >
> > I will going out with the PyGeo1.0 alpha release within the next 
> few days.
> >
> 
> 2nd look...  (I'm watching the Canadian election results instead of
> programming.... boring right now, so I went back to PyGeo's site).
> ====
> The documentation looks very complete; good from a programmer's point
> of view.  Again, I'm looking at things quickly, but there's very
> little to be disappointed from, at first view.
> 
> One minor nitpick: the links to the wolfram site contain, to my mind,
> very little material.  Compared to the amount of work PyGeo must have
> required, I'd suggest a tiny bit more and do your own write up (with
> PyGeo generated pictures!) of the information that can be currently
> obtained from the wolfram site.
> 
> Ok, enough from me for tonight!  I'd encourage other people on the
> list to have a look at PyGeo!
> 
> André
>