[Edu-sig] IDLE wish (was Edu-sig Digest, Vol 31, Issue 16)
vceder at canterburyschool.org
Mon Mar 6 16:51:32 CET 2006
ajsiegel at optonline.net wrote:
> I can see that my focus on the 2nd stage disrupted the discussion of the first.
> I owe an apology and I offer it.
Completely accepted for my part. It actually clears up why we couldn't
understand each other - we were discussing different questions. As to
part 2, I would tend to come down more on the conservative side myself.
> I am not yet a fan of easy install, and I know I am not alone in that.
> And there is nothing at all easy about it at the monent, it requiring an install of the
> My point about IDLE not running setup.py is and was exactly to this issue. I still wish
> I could get some substantive reaction, I think it important.
I agree, actually. I would say it's just one of IDLE's shortcomings, but
I've noticed it as well. This lack of ability to run a script with
parameters makes IDLE much less useful for intermediate programmers as
well. Add to that IDLE's general quirkiness (esp. on Windows), a few
stray bugs, and it is definitely not helping the cause.
This time for sure!
-Bullwinkle J. Moose
Vern Ceder, Director of Technology
Canterbury School, 3210 Smith Road, Ft Wayne, IN 46804
vceder at canterburyschool.org; 260-436-0746; FAX: 260-436-5137
More information about the Edu-sig