[Edu-sig] The fate of raw_input() in Python 3000
kirby urner
kirby.urner at gmail.com
Fri Sep 8 17:07:05 CEST 2006
On 9/8/06, Radenski, Atanas <radenski at chapman.edu> wrote:
> You are obviously way more intelligent than the average student whom we need to teach. > Our job is to teach Python programming to anyone who may happen to be in our
> classes. What is good for you may not be good for ordinary beginners. Ordinary mortals > usually do not find the meaning of life in the beausty of import statements :-)
Ordinary mortals should. I don't like pandering to beginners, dumbing
it all down for their sake. Arthur, a paradigm beginner at one point
(an articulate one though) made it clear that *he* doesn't want
dumbing down "to make it easier for newbies" either. He *hates* being
condescended to (and I appreciate that).
So I, for my part, as a teacher (professionally, I get paid), do NOT
regard it as my job to dilute Python to whatever extent necessary. I
talk about namespaces immediately, on the very first day, as I've
chronicled in this archive. Teachers who don't: I compete with them,
I say "here, you learn Kung Fu, there, they treat you like you'll
never have skills."
> > I think the professors are very wrong here.
>
> May be there are, or may be they are not.
>
> > Art
>
> Atanas
And I *certainly* champion the right to take issue with "professors"
even within their realm of maximum expertise (teaching, supposedly,
but we many times discover otherwise).
Kirby
More information about the Edu-sig
mailing list