[Email-SIG] question on syntax of 'group' in address-list
Glenn Linderman
glenn at nevcal.com
Mon May 16 23:56:35 CEST 2011
On 5/16/2011 1:40 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> I've gone through the RFCs and done some additional googling,
> and haven't been able to confirm the answer to this question: what
> exactly is the syntax when a group is included in an address-list? (See
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.4). The question is, if
> another address follows the group, are they separated from each other by
> ';' or by ';,'? The ABNF seems to call for the latter, but I can't find
> any example showing it. I'm sure that I should accept both on input,
> but I'd like to generate the correct form. Does anyone have confirmation
> or contradiction for my interpretation?
The only instance of group syntax that I have ever seen used is when a
message has all Bcc: recipients, and the email client wants to stick
something into the To: line to be pretty. I turned that off in my
Mozilla email clients after seeing it. And so in that usage, the group
was never used with other recipients.
However, I totally agree that if it were, that the ABNF would call for
both ; and , as the ; is part of the group syntax, and the , is the
separator syntax.
Would look rather stupid, though.
--
Glenn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a
mistake when you make it again. -- Franklin Jones
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/email-sig/attachments/20110516/0709cb13/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Email-SIG
mailing list