[Inpycon] Received the MOA

[Anand Balachandran Pillai]

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM, satyaakam goswami <satyaakam at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon at au-kbc.org>wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 20 Feb 2010 7:38:57 pm Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>> > > I received the MoA at my address just now and am heading over shortly
>> to
>> > > the GNUnify venue. I was a bit surprised though, weren't we also
>> supposed
>> > > to include the address proof alongwith the document ? or should we be
>> > > mailing that directly to Kenneth ?
>> >
>> > You just have to sign the document. As for the address proof, you need
>> > to mail a self attested copy directly to Kenneth. This is what I know.
>> >
>>
>> yes - and my snail mail box is still empty
>>
>>
> we have kept our self attested address proof in the signed document
> envelope itself.
>
>
 Why ? Now, it un-necessarily does the rounds along with the MoA to others
 increasing the chance of loss or damage. I didn't understand this. I had
told
 clearly to send the address proofs directly to Kenneth and only pass the
MoA
 along the channel.



> -Satya
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inpycon mailing list
> Inpycon at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
>
>


-- 
--Anand
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/private/inpycon/attachments/20100222/30430641/attachment.html>