[Inpycon] Received the MOA

[satyaakam goswami]

 On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <
abpillai at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM, satyaakam goswami <satyaakam at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon at au-kbc.org>wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday 20 Feb 2010 7:38:57 pm Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>>> > > I received the MoA at my address just now and am heading over shortly
>>> to
>>> > > the GNUnify venue. I was a bit surprised though, weren't we also
>>> supposed
>>> > > to include the address proof alongwith the document ? or should we be
>>> > > mailing that directly to Kenneth ?
>>> >
>>> > You just have to sign the document. As for the address proof, you need
>>> > to mail a self attested copy directly to Kenneth. This is what I know.
>>> >
>>>
>>> yes - and my snail mail box is still empty
>>>
>>>
>> we have kept our self attested address proof in the signed document
>> envelope itself.
>>
>>
>  Why ? Now, it un-necessarily does the rounds along with the MoA to others
>  increasing the chance of loss or damage. I didn't understand this. I had
> told
>  clearly to send the address proofs directly to Kenneth and only pass the
> MoA
>  along the channel.
>

ok we missied your point so what now do we need to send one more to Kenneth
now ?

-Satya
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/private/inpycon/attachments/20100222/d4ad7e8c/attachment-0001.html>