[IPython-dev] Pull request workflow...
dsdale24 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 11 08:12:53 EDT 2010
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Darren,
> I'm bouncing back this reply to the list, because this is a good
> question that deserves clarification. I'm hoping in the end, this
> conversation will be summarized in our guidelines, so I'd rather have
> it all publicly archived.
Thats fine. I sent it offlist because I didn't want to risk muddying
the waters unnecessarily.
> The approach I propose depends on one idea and assumption: that the
> branches aren't terribly long-lived, and that there isn't a
> complicated hierarchy of branches-from-branches. It encourages the
> development of small, self-contained feature branches.
> Note that the above doesn't preclude anyone from benefiting from a
> given feature branch and the history in trunk: they can use their
> master, or any other integration branch, where they track trunk and
> merge the feature *into*. This branch will be their personal way of
> tracking trunk and using their feature (or features, this can be done
> with multiple branches) until the feature is merged upstream. In fact
> I have done this multiple times already, and it works fine.
> Does this sound reasonable? I'm no git expert though, so it's quite
> possible there are still cases I haven't considered or where the above
> is insufficient. We'll have to find the patterns that fit them as we
> encounter them.
It does. Do we assume that the only branches that are safe to track
are the ones published at the ipython page at github?
More information about the IPython-dev