[IronPython] Ironpython 0.7 released!
KarmaSlave at MyRealBox.com
Tue Mar 29 05:10:39 CEST 2005
I am afraid we have arrived at a misunderstanding: I do not "miss" the
point; I realize and understand it fully. However, I am not subject to
the whims of 'the name is stupid, thus, the product is stupid' so I tend
to try and reflect the technical aspects and their valued merits or
disadvantages, as I am not a politician and care little for the whole
mud-slinging about something as trivial as a name or brand.
Thank you for your understanding, and I hope this clears things up. ;)
> You miss the point. The license seems fairly reasonable, but the fact
> that its called "Shared Source" causes a negative PERCEPTION. Saying
> "people aught not think that way" doesn't solve the problem. Going to
> any number of almost identical licenses that are OSI approved would
> solve the perception problems without causing any issue from the
> actual legal perspective.
> Its a simple matter of swaying public opinion.
> -- Jon
More information about the Ironpython-users