[IronPython] IronPython and standard Python libraries
Martin Maly
martmaly at exchange.microsoft.com
Wed May 18 01:55:22 CEST 2005
As I said, what I did was merely import the files. I did not run them.
That will be the next step.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com
> [mailto:users-ironpython.com-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On
> Behalf Of John Doty
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 4:36 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython and standard Python libraries
>
> On 5/17/05, Martin Maly <martmaly at exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > After reading Anthony's email on CPython's standard
> libraries I tried
> > to import the libraries using IronPython to see how well IronPython
> > does just importing the libraries. Out of 182 modules that
> I tried to
> > import
> > 116 imported successfully (which does not unfortunately
> mean that they
> > would also run correctly) and 66 of the 182 standard
> Python's library
> > modules fail to import. The most frequent recurrent theme of the
> > import failures was missing built-in modules (struct, exception,
> > errno, ...) or unimplemented features. The detailed results
> are below.
> ...
> > Running socket.py ... PASS
> ...
>
> This is interesting. Did somebody go and port _socket? If
> not, how did you run this test battery? (If so, looks like I
> wasted my Sunday
> afternoon...)
>
> thanks,
> john
> _______________________________________________
> users-ironpython.com mailing list
> users-ironpython.com at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
More information about the Ironpython-users
mailing list