[Mailman-Developers] Administrivia: Move to EZMLM (fwd)

[Nigel Metheringham]

claw@kanga.nu said:
> An message interesting for some of the advantages they see in EZMLM as
> versus ListServ.  While obviously not the driving forces, the comments
> about Precedence: and Sender: headers caught me by surprise. 

Relating this to mailman, it appears to me that we do the right thing 
(tm) with both those headers.

The big advantage with EZMLM is the bounce handling - basically because 
it uses VERP and mangles the envelope.   The downside is the mail-only 
one address per function (subscriber) control interface (although it is 
proof against the Outlook user incapable of sending plain unencoded 
text problem).   Those that pay per byte bandwidth charges might also 
find ezmlm more expensive to run.

	Nigel.


-- 
[ Nigel Metheringham           Nigel.Metheringham@InTechnology.co.uk ]
[ Phone: +44 1423 850000                         Fax +44 1423 858866 ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]