[Mailman-Developers] New SpamAssassin handler on sf.
jon at csh.rit.edu
Mon Nov 17 18:27:12 EST 2003
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:52:44PM +0000, Richard Barrett wrote:
> >I agree with Jeff. I don't plan on maintaining my SpamAssassin patch
> >passed its current incarnation. I welcome a standard implementation.
> Might I ask why enthusiasts for integration SpamAssassin with Mailman
> do not care about delivery of spam to other mail aliases in their
> domain. And if they do so care, why do they not concentrate on stopping
> spam reaching all of their mail aliases.
> I guess I cannot understand why you are messing around integrating
> SpammAssassin with Mailman when you should be integrating it with your
> MTA so that the spam never gets anywhere near Mailman.
That's actually the reason why I'm no longer maintaining my patch;
I've moved to an amavisd / SpamAssassin system that hangs off of
Postfix's delivery chain.
Because of this, I'd still like to see a standard SpamAssassin-aware
handler in Mailman that could react to the tagged messages.
Jon Parise (jon at csh.rit.edu) :: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/
More information about the Mailman-Developers