[Mailman-Developers] New SpamAssassin handler on sf.

Jon Parise jon at csh.rit.edu
Mon Nov 17 18:27:12 EST 2003

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:52:44PM +0000, Richard Barrett wrote:

> >I agree with Jeff.  I don't plan on maintaining my SpamAssassin patch
> >passed its current incarnation.  I welcome a standard implementation.
> Might I ask why enthusiasts for integration SpamAssassin with Mailman 
> do not care about delivery of spam to other mail aliases in their 
> domain. And if they do so care, why do they not concentrate on stopping 
> spam reaching all of their mail aliases.
> I guess I cannot understand why you are messing around integrating 
> SpammAssassin with Mailman when you should be integrating it with your 
> MTA so that the spam never gets anywhere near Mailman.
That's actually the reason why I'm no longer maintaining my patch;
I've moved to an amavisd / SpamAssassin system that hangs off of
Postfix's delivery chain.

Because of this, I'd still like to see a standard SpamAssassin-aware
handler in Mailman that could react to the tagged messages.

Jon Parise (jon at csh.rit.edu)  ::  http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/

More information about the Mailman-Developers mailing list