[Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:47:54AM -0400, Bob Puff at NLE wrote:
> Where is your fix for this bug?

I've mentioned two bugs in my email you've quoted below.
One [ 665732 ] is fixed, the other [ 815297 ] is not.
The patch for the former is attached to the bug report.
(Can't verify as sf is currently down for maintenance.)

> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de>
> To: mailman-developers at python.org
> Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:22:19 +0200
> Subject: [Mailman-Developers] Bug priorities (for 2.1.3)?

> > I have a question and a remark regarding the handling of bugs:
> > 
> > * What attributes do bugs need to get into the next release
> >   when a fix is available. As announced on the 14th of August to this
> >   list I fixed a priority 7 bug and did not receive feedback on it.
> >   Is there a special reason why it wasn't included in the 2.1.3 release?
> >   [ 665732 ] List-Id should be one line.
> > 
> > * There is a very annoying bug (reproduced with 2.1.2, 2.1.3 test
> >   scheduled) in environments where people sign their emails, 
> >   because Mailman breaks the signature. 
> > 
> >  [ 815297 ] Breaking signatures in message/rfc822 attachement!
> >  http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=815297&group_id=103&atid=100103
> > 
> >   I suggest raising the priority of this bug, 
> >   because it might give Mailman a bad reputation with 
> >   security aware people. 
> >   And once established such an image is hard to loose again.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20031002/176f7210/attachment.bin