[Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman roadmap

[Barry Warsaw]

On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Brian J Mingus wrote:

> Perhaps the failure of the mailman dev team to attract community
> participation can be related not to any crazy versioning scheme but  
> rather
> to a failure to engage with the community. I have only recently  
> subscribed
> to this list and I can say that you and every other person that read  
> my
> e-mail saw fit to ignore it. Your null hypothesis, namely that  
> people who
> send questions and not patches to the list are not worth your time,  
> costs
> you dearly in the long run.

Hi Brian,

I'm sorry, but I don't remember seeing your message on the list.  For  
any misunderstandings like this, I take full blame and  
responsibility.  I can say that I value all contributions from the  
community, whether it be in the form of questions, patches,  
complaints, kudos, or stacks of dollar bills. :)

I think the mailman-developers list is fairly typical for an open  
source project.  I invite you to repost your message and this time  
I'll keep an eye out for it.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/attachments/20091111/fda4f406/attachment.pgp>