[Mailman-Users] Re: [Mailman-Developers] Reverting question
Barry A. Warsaw
barry at digicool.com
Tue Nov 14 07:07:01 CET 2000
>>>>> "PB" == Phil Barnett <midnight at the-oasis.net> writes:
PB> I specifically mean downgrading. I have a hornets nest on my
PB> hands and I'm about to lose my lists back to egroups.
You don't want to downgrade. See my untested patch in a different
PB> This lack of reply to the list 'updated feature' has them
I'm surprised. I would think that munging reply-to is only useful for
lists of people who don't know how to drive their MUAs. Is the
problem just that they got used to one way of doing things, and now
there's a different way? That I can sympathize with. Is it that
suddenly, some people are getting two copies of messages because
people don't know how to trim their headers? Yeah, that sucks.
Or is it something else?
More information about the Mailman-Users