[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.0.5 is broken on RH70
Barry A. Warsaw
barry at digicool.com
Tue May 15 16:08:58 CEST 2001
>>>>> "JM" == Joe Morris <morris at unc.edu> writes:
JM> Anyone reading the mail here, folks? I and several other
JM> people have reported problems with upgrading to Mailman 2.0.5
JM> and have things go dead. Common problem is no response to
JM> email messages sent to <listname>-request aliases.
JM> I have not changed my MTA, sendmail reports delivery of
JM> message to the program, there are no errors, nothing to point
JM> a finger at. It simply disappears into a black hole inside of
JM> Mailman.
JM> Would someone please take a closer look at this? If this is a
JM> bad dsitribution, then please tell us and yank from the site
JM> so we're not stuck scratching our heads wondering what we've
JM> done wrong.
I haven't got a RH7 system to experiment with, but I have heard of all
kinds of other problems with RH7. IIRC, they shipped a buggy libc
that was never intended to be in production.
You've done some tracing of the message through the system, and you
know that sendmail gets the incoming message and hands it off ot
Mailman. So, is the message sitting in the qfiles directory? That
might point to a problem with cron for example. Or maybe your upgrade
lost your crontab entries, which are required to get qrunner to clear
your queue.
-Barry
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list