[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1b3 qrunner performance (backlog)
Barry A. Warsaw
barry at python.org
Sun Oct 20 03:55:35 CEST 2002
>>>>> "ADC" == Andrew D Clark <andrew.clark at ucsb.edu> writes:
ADC> I'm pretty sure lag in archiving is what was causing the
ADC> whole thing to back up in 2.0.12. So, although the backlog
ADC> is now mostly isolated to archiving (a very good thing) I'm
ADC> looking for a solution to fix that. Not archiving is not an
ADC> option. Should forking more ArchRunners help with this, or
ADC> will this just cause more contention?
Because of the list locks, it'll only help if you're archiving
messages for a bunch of lists. But if that's the case, it'll
definitely help (at the cost of more cpu) because ArchRunner --
actually all the qrunners -- can only handle one message at a time.
More information about the Mailman-Users