[Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

[Richard Barrett]

Todd

It would help to know which version of the patch file you are using and 
where you got it from.

I have grep'ed my copies of the various versions of my htdig patch file and 
cannot find a line that reads as you assert yours does; see the grep 
results below.

There are three lines containing the string "(os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff" 
in the various 2.1 patch files: one each for the scripts nightly_htdig, 
remote_nightly_htdig and remote_nightly_htdig_noshare.

But I cannot see the assignment your copy of nightly_htdig is said to contain.

It would appear to be that the file added by the patch has been "corrupted" 
somehow.

I'd suggest download a new copy of the latest version of the patch.

If I can be of further assistance then let me know.

Richard

mailman at mailman2:/mailman/build/patches> find . -name "htdig*.patch" | 
xargs grep "(os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff"
./current/htdig-2.1-0.3.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./current/htdig-2.1-0.3.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./current/htdig-2.1-0.3.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.2.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.2.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.2.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.3.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.3.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.3.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b3-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b4-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b4-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b4-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b5-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b5-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b5-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b6-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b6-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1b6-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1rc1-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1rc1-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1rc1-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1-0.1.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1-0.2.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1-0.2.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
./old/htdig-2.1-0.2.patch:+        status = (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
mailman at mailman2:/mailman/build/patches>


At 15:21 22/01/2003, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>I also get the following error from nightly_htdig:
>
>Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/var/mailman/cron/nightly_htdig", line 153, in ?
>     main()
>   File "/var/mailman/cron/nightly_htdig", line 138, in main
>     if status:
>NameError: global name 'status' is not defined
>
>Which corresponds to the code:
>
>     dUmMy= (os.system(cmd) >> 8) & 0xff
>     if status:
>         print _('rundig failed for list %(name)s, exit code: %(status)s')
>
>It seems like "dUmMy" should be replaced by "status".
>
>  - todd