[Mailman-Users] Re: Mailman-Users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 19
wfroning at uop.edu
Tue May 6 19:27:11 CEST 2003
I have this same problem. -admin gives me bounces, but -owner works.
Mailman 2.1.1 w/ htDig
n Tue, 06 May 2003 12:01:13 -0400
mailman-users-request at python.org wrote:
> From: Greg Westin <python.org at gregwestin.com>
> To: jonc at nc.rr.com
> Cc: mailman-users at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] "Uncaught bounce notification" for -admin
> addresses Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 10:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
> > Tell me what you get when you do a:
> > ~mailman/bin/list_members mailman
> I get the address that is listed for the administrator of the mailman
> > Also what happens if you take a message and save it to a file called
> > test.eml and then feed it to your test list's admin:
> > su mailman
> > cat test.eml |/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman admin test
> > If this works then the problem is in the aliases file (or postfix's
> > interpretation of the alias).
> This resulted in the same sort of bounce notification message as
> before. So I guess the aliases are OK. Where else could the problem
> be? If this isn't happening on anyone else's system, it must be a
> problem with the way I upgraded this server or something. But again,
> it also seems to be happening on another server I didn't upgrade.
> Thanks again for helping to get to the bottom of this,
> Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php
> > On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 19:26, Greg Westin wrote:
> >> The e-mail addresses are valid, and are indeed subscribed to the
> >list.> Would it matter if the subscribed addresses had names
> >associated with> them? It doesn't look like you can enter real names
> >for the> administrators.
> >> It seems strange that this is happening on two different servers...
> >> perhaps something went wrong in upgrading them from 2.0 that isn't
> >> true of
> >> the servers you're looking at, where you did a cleaner upgrade? I
> >> don't
> >> know what might be wrong here... why are these messages being
> >treated> as
> >> bounces?
> >> Greg
> >> On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 06:22 PM, Jon Carnes wrote:
> >>>> From the logs it looks like it is making it to the proper list
> >>>> script
> >>>> -
> >>> so it doesn't appear to be a problem with Postfix. Check the
> >email>> addresses of the folks on the list: mailman; is the admin
> >actually>> subscribed to the list?
> >>> Jon Carnes
> >> --
> >> http://www.gregwestin.com
> >> Contact info: http://www.gregwestin.com/contact.php
Unix Sys. Admin.
wfroning at uop.edu
More information about the Mailman-Users