[Mailman-Users] Re: I'm BEGGING for help here

[Richard Barrett]

On 8 Apr 2004, at 02:05, Paul H Byerly wrote:

> Richard B wrote:
>> You are asserting that your tests show some problem exists but from a
>> quick look at it, the code concerned is not obviously defective.
>
>      Well unless it's a Texas conspiracy, TC has taken it past an 
> empty assertion.
>

Even a Texan would not believe that two people making an assertion 
without presenting supporting evidence makes it the truth. And it is 
just an assertion until your example data demonstrating the problem 
exists is presented.

In either both of your cases do the test messages contain a 
X-Content-Filtered-By: header

>      Can you give me a yes or no on my reasoning?

If you want to play aggressive lawyer stuff to hostile witness then go 
someplace else!

> Should turning filtering on, leaving both fields empty, and leaving 
> text/html conversion off give the same results as not turning 
> filtering on?
>

And having text/html conversion in what state in the second case, when 
you have filter_content to Yes on?

>      If yes, can you try a test and see if the two settings result in 
> the same results for an e-mail with html formatting?
>
This is the sticking point. Provide some proof of the problem e.g. 
example data and I will try to helpf fix the problem but the normal 
practice for the guy with the problem to do that not expect volunteers
> <>< Paul
>
>