[Mailman-Users] Reply to list
Chuq Von Rospach
chuqui at plaidworks.com
Thu Feb 5 17:54:53 CET 2004
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:01 AM, John Buttery wrote:
> If the whole concept of information being irretrievably destroyed by
> clobbering Reply-To: willy-nilly isn't a compelling reason to you, I'm
> not sure what else to say.
This issue goes away if we could stop trying to use reply-to for too
many things. What we're really trying to do is make a bi-state
operation tri-state, and bad things happen.
What reply-to coercion is trying to do is fake "reply to list". That,
in reality, is its own operation. Mail clients ought to support
reply/reply-all/reply-to-list (but with one or two exceptions, don't).
And to properly support reply-to-list, you need that information in the
headers, which is done by the list-* headers mailman now provides.
Which is why we grimace everyone says "icky! delete!" because that's
how we'll ultimately get mail client authors to fix this right.....
More information about the Mailman-Users