[Mailman-Users] Reply to list
john at io.com
Sun Feb 8 11:37:05 CET 2004
* Lena at lena.kiev.ua [2004-02-05 20:02:46 +0200]:
I've read that before; doesn't change the fact that arbitrarily
overwriting the Reply-To: header destroys information.
> A good portion of my members (mostly newbies) use various web-based
> mailers. They haven't a "Reply to all" button.
Then their mailer is broken and they need to fix/change it. Two
wrongs don't make a right.
> The members are newbies in computers - what I should do, refuse them
> in medical help until they buy own computer (a year average monetary
> income here) and master it? Please remember that almost all members
> on non-technical lists are FAR less savvy than you are.
That's not a compelling argument. There are plenty of web-based
mailers that _do_ have a group-reply function (geez, even Hotmail and
Yahoo can handle that much).
This all really comes down to one thing, and I apologize to everyone
if this comes out a bit harsh but it's a pet peeve of mine. I really
could care less what a newbie "expects to see", I care about doing the
right thing. Hopefully they coincide, but this is one of those cases
where they don't, and penalizing all the members of a mailing list by
having their Reply-To's erased just so that some newbie doesn't have to
think is not acceptable to me. It's the Outlook virus, and I'm not
talking about a computer virus this time.
Ford doesn't provide a chauffeur with every new car. Learn the tool.
John ! Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid
Buttery! thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers
www.io.c! and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than
om/~john! having to think. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/attachments/20040208/77935530/attachment.pgp
More information about the Mailman-Users