[Mailman-Users] Implicit destination

[Mark Sapiro]

John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>Other adverse consequences depend on the population of list members.
>
>One of them:  we have some who seem to think that CC'ing to all their
>friends and BCC'ing the list is somehow clever.  What it does, of course, is
>reveal a bunch of addresses to the list members...the owners of the
>addresses may be less than pleased.
>
>When I get that kind of implicit destination hold, I reject it with an
>explanation.

Good point but you can also catch most of these in the
"max_num_recipients" filter.

--
Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan