[Mailman-Users] Virus Just Got Through on TOTALLY MODERATED list.
JC Dill
lists05 at equinephotoart.com
Sat Jan 29 20:11:40 CET 2005
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 8:50 AM -0800 2005-01-29, JC Dill wrote:
>
>> Didn't I say that above?
>
>
> Not that I saw, no. What I read of your message indicated that
> the virus had infected a normal user and pulled a message out of their
> sent folder, which would not have had the Approved: header.
In my first post in this thread I wrote:
> "what if there's a virus/trojan out that is able to take email that a
> user had already sent (email in the "sent" folder), and resend it with
> a virus payload (in this case, the beagle.ba virus above)? If it
> grabbed an email that the moderator had sent to the list with the
> Approved: password included, and just appended the virus payload, it
> would result in what you saw, right?"
> Most moderators I know of don't need to use the Approved: header,
> because they themselves are not moderated on their own lists. But
> then maybe you know more moderators than I do.
The ones I know that do this elect to use this method to prevent forged
posts "from" them to their one-way (newsletter) lists. If all posts
must be approved one way or another, then random forged posts (using
addresses found on a victim's computer) won't get distributed to the
list. But if a virus/trojan goes a step further and instead of just
using address found it uses actual previously sent email, and there is
saved email with the Approved: header, then that virus/trojan would be
able to forge a post to the list that would have the Approved: header,
and thus be distributed to the list.
jc
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list