[Mailman-Users] members address in to header
toddaa at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 14:00:03 CET 2006
Thank you very much. I just googled OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION and
got a ton of information about exactly what you were taking about. The FAQ
link you sent me is something that I dont think I've seen yet so I'll
proably spend a few hours there reading.
Thanks again, you've been a big help.
On 1/30/06, Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net> wrote:
> Aaron Todd wrote:
> >I know this has probably been posted a thousand times so I am sorry if I
> >annoy anyone who has been at this for years. I am new to mailman so
> >take it easy on me.
> Well then have you searched the archives of this list for your answers?
> >Is there any way for the members address to be in the
> >TO header when they get it?
> It's called 'full personalization'. If the personalization options do
> not appear on the Non-digest options page in the admin interface, It's
> because your ISP has not set OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION = Yes
> in mm_cfg.py. This may or may not be a concious decision on their part.
> >Currently when I send out an email to my list
> >each member sees the lists address in the TO and FROM headers. Reply-TO
> >pretty easy to take care of, but TO is what I am conserned about. The
> >intention of this list is to be an announcment only list. I really do
> >want to show the lists address to the user that will be getting the
> >message. I am not trying to SPAM people here...I am just trying to keep
> >message to my customers as personal as I can.
> See the FAQ. There's lots of good information there. In particular,
> article 3.11 gives lots of detail about setting up announcement lists.
> >Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
> Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net> The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
More information about the Mailman-Users