[Mailman-Users] (no subject)

[Glenn Sieb]

Everett Johnson said the following on 5/22/2006 10:53 PM:
> Why is it normal for a bounce processor to be the sender when there are 
> no bounces?  This confuses some list members.

Because, *should the message bounce to a user*... instead of the
original poster getting the bounce notification, the bounce-processor will.

This is why this is the way it is. It is perfectly acceptable, and
preferred, behaviour.

You think your users are confused now? If this behaviour wasn't there,
they'd be even more confused upon getting notified of bounces for email
to people they (probably) don't know.. ;-)

Best,
--Glenn
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
          ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759