[Mailman-Users] Re-enabling users who exceed the bouncethreshold
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Thu Oct 5 09:19:30 CEST 2006
At 11:06 AM +0900 10/5/06, <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> > Then each subsequent mail found a 'cached' block and was itself
> > blocked and also updated the cache expiration. When I stopped
> > sending for over a week, the cached entry finally expired.
> This would be a serious violation of cache semantics, though. If the
> bug occurred at the DNS level, AT&T would have been in a world of pain.
Yeah, but during the years I was working at AOL, I frequently saw all
sorts of really bizarre stuff that AT&T was doing, and I would not be
at all surprised if they actually did exactly what Mark suggested.
There are other ways to explain the same kind of behaviour, but I
certainly wouldn't put it past them.
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
Founding Individual Sponsor of LOPSA. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.
More information about the Mailman-Users