[Mailman-Users] header_filter_rules bug?

Bob Tschannen-Moran Coach at LifeTrekCoaching.com
Mon Oct 23 03:48:18 CEST 2006

Oops. Sorry, Mark, I did not see your reply at the bottom. Here are the
answers to your questions:

1. The action for that rule is Discard.
2. The post from me is held by the list until I Accept it, then it is sent
3. As the poster, I immediately receive the "Your message to LIST awaits
moderator approval" notice.
4. The post from me has the following header line: 

X-EMWD-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Not scanned:

It does not have the line:

X-EMWD-MailScanner: Not scanned:

(Which is the one I want blocked).

Let me know if you have any ideas.

May you be filled with goodness, peace, and joy.
Bob Tschannen-Moran, Founder & President
LifeTrek Coaching International
121 Will Scarlet Lane
Williamsburg, VA 23185-5043
Phone: (757) 345-3452
Fax: (772) 382-3258
Skype: LifeTrek
Web: http://www.LifeTrekCoaching.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:msapiro at value.net] 
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 9:39 PM
To: Bob Tschannen-Moran
Cc: Mailman Users
Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] header_filter_rules bug?

Please copy replies to the list.

Bob Tschannen-Moran Wrote:

>Well, now that you put it THAT way, I have done more experimenting. 
>When I put in either of the following two header_filter_rules (from
>Received: from []
>I do receive the admin notices, as one would expect. It's only when I 
>put in the following header-filter-rule
>X-EMWD-MailScanner: Not scanned
>That the admin notice fails to be sent. Crazy but true. Do you have any 

What is the action for that rule?

What happens to the post from you?

Is it possible that post also has the X-EMWD... header?

>PS -- We're using 2.1.9.cp1


Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list