[Mailman-Users] Problem with explicit destination

Mark Sapiro msapiro at value.net
Fri Jan 26 22:55:27 CET 2007


Julia Frizzell wrote:

>Just got one in right now, so let's use this one. I've replaced our  
>@address with @xxx.
>
>As far as I can see, there's no cc in here. As i said in my original  
>message, we're running Mailman 2.1.5 on OS X 10.4. We have set  
>require_explicit_destination to Yes and acceptable_aliases is blank.


If this is the Apple OS X Server Mailman, it may have modifications
that make it behave differently from standard Mailman.

>	From: 	  public_relations at planar.com
>	Subject: 	[Publications] Most popular
>	Date: 	January 26, 2007 3:52:27 PM EST
>	To: 	  publications at accessola.com


Where are you seeing the above headers? This appears to be some MUA's
rendering of the message, not the raw message headers. In a raw
message, the above headers would not precede the Received: headers.

Do you have access to the global mailbox in the list's archive? It is
the file archives/private/listname.mbox/listname.mbox. If you don't
have direct access to the file, you may have a link to it on the
list's archive table of contents page, and even if not, you may be
able to access it via a URL like
http://example.com/mailman/private/listname.mbox/listname.mbox.

What are the headers of this message in that file?


>	Received: 	from ex-gateway1-in.AD.Brown.Edu ([128.148.21.51]) by  
>mail1.AD.Brown.Edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 26 Jan  
>2007 15:53:03 -0500
>	Received: 	from draco.services.brown.edu ([128.148.106.172]) by ex- 
>gateway1-in.AD.Brown.Edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri,  
>26 Jan 2007 15:52:38 -0500
>	Received: 	from list.alliance.brown.edu (list.alliance.brown.edu  
>[128.148.108.6]) by draco.services.brown.edu (Switch-3.1.10/ 
>Switch-3.1.7/) with ESMTP id l0QKqcNZ027652; Fri, 26 Jan 2007  
>15:52:38 -0500 (EST)
>	Received: 	from list.alliance.brown.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by  
>list.alliance.brown.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B13B1AB177; Fri, 26  
>Jan 2007 15:52:38 -0500 (EST)
>	Received: 	from cpe-69-203-99-40.nyc.res.rr.com  
>(cpe-69-203-99-40.nyc.res.rr.com [69.203.99.40]) by  
>list.alliance.brown.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7581AB153 for  
><publications at xxx>; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:52:36 -0500 (EST)
>	Received: 	from [70.34.194.185] (HELO JKDJPUF) by 69.203.99.40  
>(CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.11) with SMTP id 40033759 for  
>publications at accessola.com; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:52:27 -0500
>	X-Original-To: 	publications at xxx
>	Delivered-To: 	publications at xxx
>	Message-Id: 	<020501c7418b$e3c1b190 
>$2863cb45 at cpe692039940.nyc.res.rr.com>
>	Mime-Version: 	1.0
>	X-Priority: 	3
>	X-Msmail-Priority: 	Normal
>	X-Mailer: 	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>	X-Mimeole: 	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
>	X-Beenthere: 	publications at xxx
>	X-Mailman-Version: 	2.1.5
>	Precedence: 	list
>	Content-Type: 	multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1298335293=="
>	Sender: 	publications-bounces at xxx
>	Errors-To: 	publications-bounces at xxx
>	X-Brown-Proofpoint: 	Not Infected
>	X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: 	safe
>	Return-Path: 	publications-bounces at xxx
>	X-Originalarrivaltime: 	26 Jan 2007 20:53:03.0635 (UTC) FILETIME= 
>[F8F40630:01C7418B]


The rest of these headers look like those from a raw message, but since
the first few were moved, I can't be sure what else may have been
altered.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <msapiro at value.net>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan



More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list