[Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Tue May 29 16:25:22 CEST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On May 29, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion to read the FAQ and the associated list
> postings. I actually found those same postings and tried every
> suggestion in them that was relevant. Unfortunately nothing worked to
> resolve this annoying problem. There may be a setting that is
> incorrect
> and there may be something posted that explains this problem and
> provides a solution but so far I have not located anything that
> fixes it
> for me.
>
> It is strange that a pretty vanilla installation, CentOS and Postfix
> with the latest Mailman version of 2.1.9 is so hard to configure and
> use. And this after using it on a CentOS 3 box but with frequent
> delays
> in sending and unusal errors. So moving the list was necessary but
> made
> the list totally unusable. I have heard from a few others with similar
> problems and no solution, so I know I am not the only user with these
> issues.
>
> Any further suggestions would be appreciated.
I don't have any idea what's going on, but here are some mostly
useless comments.
I'm personally still on Postfix 2.3.6, and you mentioned that you're
on Postfix 2.4.1. I wonder if there isn't some new feature, anti-
spam defense, or other setting that is tripping up Mailman. It's
also possible that Postfix 2.4.1 has some bug that's causing it to
reset the connection. I don't have time to slog through the Postfix
change logs, but I suggest you take a look to see if there's anything
relevant.
You might also try the Postfix 2.4.2 release candidate, and/or
grabbing Postfix 2.3.9 to see if that improves things. IME, Postfix
is pretty easy to build and install from source.
If I were debugging this, my next step would probably be to write
some sample Python applications that stress tested SMTP connections
from a Python program. Mailman uses Python's standard smtplib
module, so that's where I'd start. See if you can reproduce the
problem outside of Mailman.
I agree with previous posters that this is almost certainly a problem
with your Postfix installation. Mailman + Postfix has been a long-
term very stable combination, although as I said, it's possible
there's something in Postfix 2.4 that's tripping us up now.
Does anybody else use Postfix 2.4?
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBRlw303EjvBPtnXfVAQJzkQP/aOE2ajjFTZMOV2WKJ0qyg3HWw/qNpSRb
P4+E3pxe8XG+lbI9+rVO0vmDkMlr2llrKGao9URc5CNMKUKHZNw9ECxP+NOnKhDu
auyQQYZc6axxq3Ny7YMcalB1fbhgpj2Rj6rycowb188JadQLaQNy4unjciBe+z6F
fh3vwvpbPB4=
=uJ5O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list