[Mailman-Users] unparseable message

[Mark Sapiro]

Barry Finkel wrote:

>Mark Sapiro replied to one of my postings:
>
>>Quoting from section 5.1.1 of RFC 2045
>>
>>  The boundary may be followed by zero or more characters of linear
>>  whitespace. It is then terminated by either another CRLF and the
>>  header fields for the next part, or by two CRLFs, in which case
>>  there are no header fields for the next part.
>
>For the record (i.e., anyone who looks in the archives), the RFC is
>2046.


Thanks for the correction. I had looked at both, and wrote the wrong
number.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan