[Mailman-Users] unparseable message

Mark Sapiro mark at msapiro.net
Fri Apr 25 17:34:59 CEST 2008

Barry Finkel wrote:

>Mark Sapiro replied to one of my postings:
>>Quoting from section 5.1.1 of RFC 2045
>>  The boundary may be followed by zero or more characters of linear
>>  whitespace. It is then terminated by either another CRLF and the
>>  header fields for the next part, or by two CRLFs, in which case
>>  there are no header fields for the next part.
>For the record (i.e., anyone who looks in the archives), the RFC is

Thanks for the correction. I had looked at both, and wrote the wrong

Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list