[Mailman-Users] Microsoft Outlook and footer/signature"attachments"

[LuKreme]

On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people
> think about changing this?

Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be  
there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.

I think the solution to the OP's problem is to have a way to create a  
'Roach Motel' list, that is, one where the subscribers cannot unsub.  
However, that setting should be 1) hard to find and 2) have BLINK tag  
warnings on it.

-- 
"Let's get back to syntax of procmail and forget the syntax of
	fools." Don