[Mailman-Users] Microsoft Outlook and footer/signature"attachments"

[LuKreme]

Oh I know WHY it was done. However, being a [CENSORED] I would have  
said "Get a real client or report the bug to the mothership and hope  
[HAHAHA CACKLE CACKLE SNORT] they get around to fixing it."

You can't give those bastards an inch.

-- 
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 11, 2009, at 15:48, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

> On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people
>>> think about changing this?
>>
>> Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be  
>> there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.
>
> Historically, the option to remove them was added because people  
> complained that their MUA (that shall remain nameless) could not  
> hide them.
>
> -Barry
>