[Mailman-Users] Microsoft Outlook and footer/signature"attachments"
kremels at kreme.com
Sun Sep 13 01:08:14 CEST 2009
Oh I know WHY it was done. However, being a [CENSORED] I would have
said "Get a real client or report the bug to the mothership and hope
[HAHAHA CACKLE CACKLE SNORT] they get around to fixing it."
You can't give those bastards an inch.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2009, at 15:48, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>> Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people
>>> think about changing this?
>> Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be
>> there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.
> Historically, the option to remove them was added because people
> complained that their MUA (that shall remain nameless) could not
> hide them.
More information about the Mailman-Users