[Mailman-Users] bulk subscribe 7K users

[Dimitri Maziuk]

On 2017-10-01 22:23, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 9/29/2017 11:34 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> (mailman 2.1.12 on centos 6.9)
> 
> I don't think that Mark mentioned it, but 2.1.12 is -painfully- old (as 
> is centos 6.9) and centos packages often lag way behind the 
> corresponding source versions.
> 
> If you need to stick with 6.9, I would consider ditching the centos 
> package and installing the current mailman from source. Otherwise, can 
> you move to a more modern Linux and more recent mailman?

Mailman's been been trouble- and maintenance-free for us since we 
switched from whatever-that-perl-thing-was-called all those years ago, 
and it never occurred to me it'd something as silly as abort the running 
op because my browser timed out. Now that I know, I'll consider 
"upgrading" -- to the university-run lyris: I might as well outsource 
the whole thing.

Dima