[MATRIX-SIG] Numerical Python Release 1.0
Paul F. Dubois
Paul F. Dubois" <email@example.com
Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:13:27 -0800
Thanks for the reports.
Note that the release notes and one of the screens in the Windows installer
specifically mention that this version does not do the installation into the
path. You can just take the Lib/ and pyds/ contents and move them into your
path. The reason is that I have to take the time to learn how to do that and
I want to be sure I have it right before screwing up everyone's registry. Or
worse, *my* registry.
From: Andrey Kaliazin <KaliazinA@cardiff.ac.uk>
To: Paul F. Dubois <firstname.lastname@example.org>; matrix-sig <email@example.com>
Date: Thursday, March 05, 1998 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [MATRIX-SIG] Numerical Python Release 1.0
>>On ftp-icf.llnl.gov/pub/python there are two files:
>>NumPy10.exe -- Windows 95/NT installer (MSVC 5.0)
>>NumPy10.tgz -- Sources (NumPy/...)
>>The Windows installer gives you a choice of binary or full install.
>>install is needed only if you intend to make your own C extensions.
>>Please see the file release_notes.txt for details.
>Just installed NumPy 1.0 release (binaries only) on my Win'95,
>and have problems:
>1. Installation procedure do not update paths in registry;
>2. Two files are missed - "FFt.py" and "RandomArray.py";
>3. Mlab.by still have wrong import (Numeric.Random) and
> reference (old?) - to Numeric.Random.random_sample()
> (when I replace them for RandomArray.random() it is Ok)
>4. Why tests for LA, FFT, RANLIB are not included into
>5. (optional) why diff() is not included into standard set of
>and maybe other common knowns as integ(), interp()
>and so on, from Yorick for example are also good candidates?
MATRIX-SIG - SIG on Matrix Math for Python
send messages to: firstname.lastname@example.org
administrivia to: email@example.com